When you read a scientific work with equations there could be surprises and confusion
even in the notation. Here I want to speak about the one I encountered recently, when
looking at the Navier-Stokes equation.
First I thought, the result of the operation should be a vector since it appears as a
term in a vectorial equation so it was natural for me to consider it as a gradient of a
scalar product of two vectors. Then I started remembering the formula for the gradient
of a scalar product.
Here the star represents the vector on which the nabla operator acts. Those could
be expressed as follows( (*,*) - scalar product, [*,*] - vector product ):
and swapping a and b we also get
Then combining the last 3 equations we get:
Which differs from the first equation.
Then It came to me that the term
is a flux of a momentum, that is a flux of a
vector quantity. This means that each coordinate of the quantity should be multiplied
by each coordinate of the velocity, which gives us the following tensor:
Then each component of the divergence D of the flux will have the following form
which is equivalent to
Which, I suppose, is exactly what the author had in mind.